“Pagar makan padi" in early publications and manuscripts

The Malay phrase pāgar mākan pādi or

ڤاڬر ماكن ڤادي
can be found in R. J. Wilkinson's Malay-English Dictionary. On p. 449, Wilkinson wrote:
ڤاڬر pagar.
A fence; a palissade; a row of stakes or palings.
Pagar makan padi: the fence eats up the padi;
the precautions for diminishing loss eat up the profit. . .
Even though the example given (in a business context) is rather odd (since the phrase pāgar mākan pādi is normally used when trust is betrayedSee Abdullah Hassan's Kamus Istimewa Peribahasa Melayu (2nd ed.) for example. Entry 2930: Padi makan padi (= tanaman). Orang yang kita percayai berkhianat kepada kita, in , p. 160. Cross-references are made to Entries 2939, 3735, 3996, and 4217, which are (a) Pancing makan umpan (p. 160); (b) Sokong membawa rebah (p. 201); (c) Telunjuk mencocok (= merosok, menikam) mata (p. 214); (d) Tongkat membawa rebah (p. 225).),
The English title of the book by Ozay Mehmet is Development in Malaysia: Poverty, wealth and trusteeship when it was published by Groom-Helm in 1986. The Malay title chosen for the book was it was translated was: Pagar makan padi!: Amanah, kemiskinan dan kekayaan dalam pembangunan Malaysia di bawah Dasar Ekonomi Baru. The Malay version of the book was published by INSAN in 1987.
Wilkinson's dictionary entry does, however, gives us a solid record on the fact that ڤاڬر (and not ڤڬر) is the subject of the Malay proverb, and also on how the spelling for word pāgar is handled about 100 years ago.

A Malay-English Dictionary by R. J. Wilkinson, published in 1901, by Kelly and Walsh Limited, Singapore, p. 449.

It is spelt with consonant p, long vowel ā, consonant g, and consonant r. So strictly speaking it ought to be pāgar and not pagar (and definitely not pĕgar, as asserted by the revisionists). Also, the short vowel a between g and r is not explicitly shown, it shows that the Arabic diacritical mark for short vowel a, Fatha َ◌, is not consistently employed in the Jawi spelling scheme.

The similar phrase (rendered as old Dutch spelling as: pagar djoega mĕmakan padi) can also in a Dutch papersee H. C. Klinkert (1866) Eenige Maleische spreekwoorden en spreeekwijzen, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië 13de Deel, [3e Volgreeks, 1e Deel], p. 40 and p. 58. published by H. C. Klinkert in 1866.

Page 40 (in Jawi script) and Page 58 (Romanized Malay with Dutch explanation) of H. C. Klinkert's Eenige Maleische spreekwoorden en spreeekwijzen. The English translation of the title of the Dutch paper is: Some Malay proverbs and speeches.
In classical Malay literature, the first known usage of the Malay proverb can be found in Hikayat Hang Tuah, where the word pagar is used as a derogatory reference to Hang Tuah, and padi is reference to the concubines in Sultan Melaka's palace. The story is distilled by R. O WinstedtR. O. Winstedt (1921) Hikayat Hang Tuah, Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society No. 83 (April 1921), p. 116 in the following passage:
. . .All the officers of the court hate Hang Tuah and tells Pateh Kerma Wijaya he is “a fence eating the crop", an officer of the court who seduces the Raja's concubines. . .

For the full narrative of the story, we can consult Muhammad Haji Salleh's English translation of Hikayat Hang Tuah, which he published in 2010. Prof. Muhammad's translation on pp. 315 - 316 is reproduced as follows:

When they concluded their meeting, all the officials and loards proceeded to Patih Kerma Wijaya's residence. On their arrival, all of them cast their headdresses and keris down before him. His attention caught by this sudden demonstration.

Patih Kerma Wijaya asked: “Why are you all behaving in this manner My Lords? What is the reason for this?"

All the officials and lords replied, “What is the use of us being appointed officials, My Lord, when somebody commits an outrage in the palace and we stand there unable to act? Should thtere be any enemies now, surely we are they? What is the use of use standing guard day and night under His Majesty? What we have witnessed is as summed up in the proverbs of the Malays: The fence has devoured the crop. Event though we wish to bring our grievances to the ears of His Majesty, he will not listen to use; if we were to keep silent, tomorrow or the day after we shall bear this shame; so we have made it our resolve to inform Kiai Patih, for the Kiai is a great minister. As long as My Lord is aware of this matter, then at least you can bear witness to us."

As soon as he heard their grievances, Patih Kerma Wijaya asked, “Who dares to bring shame on this palace?"

They replied, “Who else greater than Hang Tuah who would dare commit such an act? Last night we were on guard in the courtyard of the palace it was then that we saw Hang Tuah talking to and flirting with a beloved concubine of His Majesty; we wanted to slay him at that very moment, but we were afraid that we would be found guilty by His Majesty, for Duli Yang Dipertuan loves him dearly and has bestowed countless gifts on him, and we may be thought to be envious of him."
Patih Kerma Wijaya then regurgitated the same complaints to the Sultan of Melaka, on p. 317:
The Patih bowed and said, “I bring Your Majesty words of treason. What is the use of us continuing to serve as your officials? One mere individual commits an outrage, and we are not able to kill; how shall we ever defeat Your Majesty's enemies and foes, as the adage of the Malays says, “The fence has devoured the crops!"

The Raja demanded greater clarification, “What do you mean, My Lord?"

Patih Kerma Wijaya replied, “O My Lord, last night we were on guard in the courtyards; there we saw a woman from the palace with the Laksamana. Your servants wanted to kill him, but we feared to do Your Majesty wrong, for Your Majesty places your entire trust in him; moreover he is chief over all of us."
However, the phrase was uttered only once, and it was used by Patih Kerma Wijaya, in p. 248 (Chapter 9: Hang Tuha bersuaka di Inderapura dan memikat Tun Teja) of Ahmat Adam's recent transliteration (based on Manuscript 23, University of Malaya Library. See also Or. 16215 in the British Library. Both the British Library copy (dated between 1828 to 1835) and the University of Malay Library copy are derived from the same parent manuscript):
. . . sekalian ke bawah Duli Yang Dipertuan. Hendak patik persembahkan pun patik takut kata orang banyak ke bawah Duli Yang Dipertuan. “Lihatlah Patih Karma Wijaya dengki akan seorang hamba Raja, melihat Duli Yang Dipertuan sangat kasih akan hambanya itu." Maka sebab itulah patik tiada berani berdatang sembah. Akan sekarang adalah seperti pantun orang, ‘pagar makan padi.'"

Setelah Raja Melaka mendengar Patih Karma Wijaya demikian itu, maka Raja pun terkejut seraya bertitah, “Si Tuhakah berbuat cabul akan kita?" Maka sembah Patih Karma Wijaya, “Hang Tuhalah Tuanku, bermain-main di dalam istana Duli Yang Dipertuan intu. Selama patik sudah lihat, patik hendak persembahkan patik takut." Maka sahut segala pengawai yang disembah Patih Karma Wijaya itu, “Sungguh Tuanku; ada patik melihat Hang Tuha itu berkata-kata dengan seorang perempuan di dalam istana Duli . . .

The same phrase is repeated twice in separate chapter (Chapter 14: Marga Paksa Tujuh Bersaudara Berada di Melaka, p. 380). This time, the sequence is similar to the narrative given by Muhammad Haji Salleh, i.e. first by the court officers to Patih Kerma Wijaya, then Patih Kerma Wijaya repeated the complaint to the Sultan of Melaka.

I do not have access to Manuscript 23 but the sister copy of the University of Library manuscript can be accessed easily since it has been digitized by the British Library, and the relevant passage is shown below:
A section of folio f. 61r of Or. 16215, Hikayat Hang Tuah in British Library
The phrase ڤاڬر ماكن ڤادي (pagar makan padi) is highlighted in yellow.
A section of folio f. 101v of Or. 16215, Hikayat Hang Tuah in British Library
The phrase ڤاڬر ماكن ڤادي (pagar makan padi) is highlighted in yellow. The roman transliteration for the passage illustrated is given by Ahmat AdamAhmat Adam (2018) Hikayat Hang Tuha (atau Hikayat Hang Tua), SIRD, Petaling Jaya, p. 380. as follows:
“. . . di dalam istana lagi tiadakan terbunuh oleh hamba sekalian? Jika musuh yang lain berapa lagi? Apatah gunanya hamba duduk terkawal siang dan malam di bawah Duli Yang Dipertuan ini? Seperti pantun Melayu, ‘pagar makan padi' itu adalah hamba sekalian lihat. Hendak pun hamba sekalian persembahkan ke bawah Duli Yang Dipertuan tiada akan didengarkannya. Hendak pun sahaya diamkan kalau-kalau kemudian harinya hamba sekalian beroleh malu. Itulah dimaklumkan pada kyayi. Maka tuan pun menteri besar juga; lamun sudah kyayi tahu pun padalah saksi hamba sekalian ini." Apabila Patih Karma Wijaya mendengar kata segala kata segala pengawai itu, maka kata Patih Karma . . .
A section of folio f. 102r of Or. 16215, Hikayat Hang Tuah in British Library
The phrase ڤاڬر ماكن ڤادي (pagar makan padi) is highlighted in yellow. The roman transliteration for the passage illustrated is: . . . (seperti pantun Melayu) pagar makan padi (maka titah raja) . . .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

「日上三竿」到底是早上多少點？

Image
從吉打 Lembah Bujang 布央谷開車回家，經過怡保的時候剛好是晚餐時間。 在麥當勞用過晚餐後，發現開車的我好像也有點睏了，於是決定在怡保睡一覺。我們把車開到 Bandar Meru Raya ，然後跟 Casuarina 要了一間房間。 隔天早我見小兒子辛円睡到很遲還不願意起床，就拿起手機給他照了一張相。 大太陽曬屁股還不起身嗎？ 原想給照片標上：阿円睡到日上三竿，大太陽曬屁股還不起身。但，住在我頭腦裡面的另外一個人問我： 三竿到底是幾點？ 於是我便上網查了一下該成語的出處：「日上三竿」應該是出自《 南齊書・天文誌上・日光色 》的一段話。《南齊書・天文誌》是南齊政府天文局官員根據每日的觀測日記整理出來的天文異象報告。《日光色》的第三個記錄是這樣寫道的： 永明五年十一月丁亥，日出高三竿， 朱色赤黃，日暈，虹抱珥直背。 這段話有三個部分。第一部分「永明五年十一月丁亥」標的是日期。第二部分「日出高三竿」說的是太陽的高度，也就是當時的時間。第三部分「朱色赤黃，日暈，虹抱珥直背」解釋的當時天文局官員觀察到的天象。 通常我讀文言文的時候都會在頭腦裡面把文字翻譯成英語。因為只有這樣，才能逼我自己將每個字都解讀出來。這段話譯成英語大概是： Sunday. December 7, 487. The shadow cast by the sun is three times the height of the pole. The colour of the sky is between red and yellow. Solar haloes and parhelia are clearly visible. 我們先說日期的那一部分。「永明」指的是南齊的 蕭宣遠 先生。蕭先生是在公元483至493期間做皇帝的。永明五年自然是落在公元487年。後面的「十一月」指的是農曆十一月，而「丁亥」是中國傳統天干地支計日系統的寫法，它是一種 60模 的寫法，例如：甲子 = 1、癸亥 = 60。所以，「丁亥」的值為24。 接著我們用 Reingold與Dershowitz 的方法把農曆日期換算成格列高曆。其結果是：公元487年12月7日（既該年的第341天，\(d = 341\)）。 根據日影我
Read more

Urusan Seri Paduka Baginda和金牌急腳遞

Image
如果你或你的公司不還稅， 內陸稅收局 的人就會寄一封公函來罵你並跟你討錢。 在馬來西亞，所有的政府公函，都會印上 Urusan Seri Paduka Baginda 的字樣。「Urusan Seri Paduka Baginda」其實是延續英國人 On His Majesty's Service 的傳統。「 Seri Paduka Baginda 」這三個字的英語是「His Majesty」或「Her Majesty」，而「Urusan」則是「Service」。 現代英國郵遞系統的原型是愛德華四世國王 Edward IV (1461-1483)設計的，他為了加快情報的傳遞速度，在大概每30km就設了一根柱子(post)和一匹新馬。這樣，情報的傳遞便能達到約2 m/s。 J. C. Hemmeon在1912年出版的《The history of the British post office》是這樣寫道的： A somewhat different style of postal service, a precursor of the modern method, was inaugurated by the fourth Edward. During the war with Scotland he found himself in need of a speedier and better system of communication between the seat of war and the seat of government. He accomplished this by placing horses at intervals of twenty miles along the great road between England and Scotland. By so doing his messengers were able to take up fresh horses along the way and his despatches were carried at the rate of a hundred miles a day. 500年前2 m
Read more

Yap-Douglas letter of 1877

Image
Water disruption at Pangkalan Lumpur On 29 March 1877, Captain Yap Ah Loy wrote a Arkib Negara 1957/0000387 letter to Captain B. Douglas (r. 1875 - 1882, Acting Resident of Selangor) to relay a water-related grievance at Pangkalan Lumpur tin mine. This letter is important because it contains several important data points: Yap Ah Loy addressed himself with the Indic title (श्री इन्द्र प्रकाश विजय भक्ति = Sri Indra Perkasa Vijaya Bakti), and This shows that back in 150 years ago, it was perfectly reasonable for Malay courts to install their subjects with Indic titles and decorations, similar to the practices recounted in Sejarah Melayu. However, the way Yap addressed himself was not consistent, for instance, in 1881, he called himself Kaptan Cina Kuala Lumpur and not Kaptan Klang dalam Kuala Lumpur but he used his Indic title consistently. See Arkib Negara Document Number 1957/0001366W . called himself Captain Klang in Kuala Lump
Read more

《心經》裡面的「般若波羅蜜」一詞

Image
很多年前曾經到過香港大嶼山的 心經簡林 。 心經簡林 是一個由三十八個巨型木簡，按數學無窮大「\(\infty\)」符號的形狀排成的木陣。在木陣裡面，除了第一個題目簡、第二十三個「空」簡和最後一個落款簡之外，其他的木簡都刻有《心經》的部分經文。 《心經》的全名叫《般若波羅蜜多心經》。我是在香港電影《 月光寶盒 》裡面，第一次聽到「般若波羅蜜多」這個詞的。在戲裡面，它是周星馳先生用來開啓可以讓時光倒流的月光寶盒的密語。必須注意的是，周先生把咒語唸成了「般若波羅蜜」，把「多」字給去掉了。 月光寶盒 的密語：般若波羅蜜. . . 不管「般若波羅蜜多」或是「般若波羅蜜」，念起來很別扭，很明顯它們都不是漢語，事實上，它們是由三個印度字組成的合成詞。「般若」的巴利語「paññā」的音譯：是知識或智慧的意思。「波羅」是巴利語「pāra」的音譯，它和英語前綴「para」一樣，是超越的意思，例如，英語「paranormal」就是超自然的意思。「蜜／蜜多」是巴利語「mī/mīta」的音譯，它是希臘語「metron」的親戚，也是英語「mete」或「measure」的祖先，想表達的是既定或肯定的意思。 把「paññā」+「pāra」+「mī」三個印度字連在一起，「般若波羅蜜」指的便是一種備受肯定、完美超凡的智慧。在周星馳先生的哲學世界裡面，也只有利用這種完美超凡的知識transcendental wisdom，才能將時空逆轉。 大嶼山的心經簡林與數學的無窮大「\(\infty\)」符號 可惜的是，我們暫時還沒有發現這種transcendental wisdom。可喜的是，數學家倒是發現了很多transcendental number（ 波羅蜜數 ）。波羅蜜數是一種很特別的數，因為你必須用無窮大「\(\infty\)」的概念才能將它正確地寫出來。例如，銀行用來算 複利息 的「\(e = 2.718\ldots\)」，就是一个波羅蜜數。 $$e = 2 + \frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{2}{3+\frac{3}{4+\frac{4}{5+\frac{5}{6+\frac{6}{7+\frac{7}{8+\frac{8}{9+\frac{9}{\ddots}}}}}}}}}} = 2.718\
Read more

孔子時代開車的藝術

Image
之前我們講 學而篇 的時候講到了 六藝 。 這裡我們看一下六藝里的第四藝：有關開馬車的技術和禮貌。 孔子時代開車的技術和禮貌 南宋‧王應麟《玉海》卷四十四、第十一頁 孔子的時代，馭馬車要記得五點：鳴和鸞、逐水曲、過君表、舞交衢和逐禽左。南宋的 王應麟 （公元1223至1296）先生在編寫《 玉海 》這本百科全書時，是這樣解釋的：地官保氏六藝四，曰五馭。注：五馭，鳴和鸞、逐水曲、過君表、舞交衢、逐禽左。正義：馭車有五種。 鳴和鸞者，和在軾，鸞在𢖍，《韓詩》云：升車則馬動，馬動則鸞鳴，鸞鳴則和應。 逐水曲，謂馭車隨水勢之屈曲，而不墜水也。 過君表者，謂若《毛傳》云：褐纒旃以為門，裘纒質以為槸，間容握，駈而入，擊則不得入。《穀梁》亦云：艾蘭以為防，置旃以為轅門，以葛覆質以為槷，流旁握，御轚者不得入。 舞交衢者，御車在交道，車旋應於舞節也。 逐禽左者，謂御驅逆之車，逆駈禽獸使左，當人君所射之。人君自左射。《禮記》云：佐車止，則百姓田獵是也。 若把馬車換成汽車，孔子所指的馭藝術的現代解讀是： 鳴和鸞：噪音別太多，車笛別亂鳴。 逐水曲：駕車駕好好，別駕出線。 過君表：即時讓位給有需要的車子。 舞交衢：在路口別亂來。 逐禽左：超車請有禮貌，要知道左和右的正確用法。
Read more