Sins of various degrees

Euler's formula eiΩ=sin(AΩ)+isinΩ, where A=12π, is an interesting formula because we can use it express various types of sins in our complex world, and it says that sins of various degrees are ultimately imaginary.

Here is the proof. First we suppose Ω=12πω, since eiπω/2=e(iπ/2)ω=(eiπ/2)ωwe must have sin(A12πω)+isin12πω=[sin(A12π)+isin12π]ω=iω and if we start with Ω=12πω, the following is true: sin(A+12πω)isin12πω=[sin(A+12π)isin12π]ω=(i)ω

Since sin(A+12πω)=sin(A12πω), adding (i)ω to iω gives: sin12πω=12iω(i)ωi

We can now test the formula with specific values of ω=1α. For α=1,2,3,2+3,2×3, we have the following special sins. sinπ2=12i(i)i=1=sin90sinπ4=12i1/2(i)1/2i=12=sin45sinπ6=12i1/3(i)1/3i=12=sin30sinπ10=12i1/5(i)1/5i=2+312=sin18sinπ12=12i1/6(i)1/6i=2(31)2=sin15 Usually only α=1,2,3 are covered in the classroom and you can therefore be forgiven for your sin of not knowing the last two sins. But the last two sins are very useful because they can be used to construct a value for the sin of trinity, t=sin3=sin(1815): sinπ60=2(3+1)(51)2(31)5+516=sin3 In fact, the sin of trinity is the penultimate sin which the Greeks were able to build in radicals. Although the Greeks know from the triple-angle formula that the sin of unity, u=sin1 is related to t by the following equation: 3u4u3=t they were not able to handle the power of three and therefore could not go one step further to reduce the sin of trinity to the ultimate sin of unity. Therefore Ptolemy had no choice but to reluctantly live his entire mathematical career with the following inequality: 23sin32<u<43sin34 where |12(23sin32+43sin34)sin1|106. In 15th century AD, the Persian mathematician Jamshid al-Kashi was able to obtain approximate values for u with astronomical precision (16 decimal places) by employing the following numerical iteration uk+1=13(t+4uk3),u0=0 since |u6sin1|1017 and |u7sin1|1020.

The secret of the power of three, and therefore the radical expression for the sin of unity, was partially unlocked only a century later by Italian mathematicians (del Ferro, Tartaglia, Cardan, etc): sinπ180=t+i1t231i3+11+31i3t+i1t23=sin1I believe this is the best radical expression which one can write down for u. Alternatively, you can keep your sin in its imaginary form: u=12i1/90(i)1/90i I know these sin expressions do not look pretty, for this, please accept my apology.


Finally, as a takeaway exercise, please see if you can show that one-third of the product of all the integer sins in the first cartesian quadrant (k=1,2,,90) can be written as: 13k=190sinkπ180=52λ where λ=27+72 is the 8th Leyland number.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Urusan Seri Paduka Baginda和金牌急腳遞

「日上三竿」到底是早上多少點?

《心經》裡面的「般若波羅蜜」一詞

The children of Yap Ah Loy sued their mum in court (1898 - 1904)

The Sang Kancil Story of Malacca